|
< < <
Date Index |
Re: [nas] U.S. Soccer addresses decision not to sanction NASL or USL by Keith Bundy 01 January 2010 07:27 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
Also, at least a couple of the NASL teams had to be in doubt due to the court case... not sure of the merits one way or the other, but you can at least say that there was an air of uncertainty around Baltimore and Tampa Bay due to the case. On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Brandon Allbery <allbery@kf8nh.com> wrote : > On Jan 1, 2010, at 00:20 , Ethan Gomberg wrote: >> USL1 has 3 real teams, Austin, Portland, PR Islanders. > (...) >> NASL has 6 established teams: Montreal, Vancouver, Rochester, >> Carolina, Miami and Baltimore > (...) >> After reading those facts, who is more realistic? USL1 or NASL? > > > NASL's obviously closer, but neither one has enough teams to pull off > a meaningful season.(*) Which comes back to the USSF's move, which > appears to be intended to force the issue one way or another. > > (*) 6 teams was enough for the last MLL season, so it's not impossible. --- See all of today's Soccer News Links at: http://www.sams-army.com/ NAS is hosted by America Kicks (http://www.americakicks.com) To subscribe or unsubscribe: http://nas.americakicks.com To post, send an email to nas@americakicks.com
|
< < <
Date Index |
North American Soccer List List Archives |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |