The simple answer.
The Mutiny had no owner and no one on the horizon who was interested. And they were losing a ton of money.
The Fusion had a terrible owner who alianated anyone around him, he had the smallest front office and sales staff in history, dd no marketing and expected people to come just because he was there.
Oh, and by thr way, was losing a ton of money.
It's shame really.
Cheers!
Robert.
In a message dated 8/11/06 9:52:25 AM, mrmoore01@bluemarble.net writes:
Perhaps it is Friday and I'm just bored? It is also possible, that since
I grew up in the bay area, I am biased?
However, in looking at current MLS attendances and comparing them to
Miami and Tampa's........I have to say.....WTH is the difference and why
were these teams in so much "trouble" and current ones are not? Admittedly,
the Mutiny were better supported than Miami, but why ditch both>?
This has probably been discussed before in depth. However, my curiosity
got peaked again on this.
Explain it as below are the attendances for the Muntiny and Fusion:
Mutiny:
• 1996: 11,679
• 1997: 11,338
• 1998: 10,312
• 1999: 13,106
• 2000: 9,452
• 2001: 14,479
Fusion:
• 1998: 10,284
• 1999: 8,689
• 2000: 7,460
• 2001: 11,177
---
See all of today's Soccer News Links at: http://www.sams-army.com/
NAS is hosted by America Kicks (http://www.americakicks.com)
To subscribe or unsubscribe: http://nas.americakicks.com
To post, send an email to nas@americakicks.com
---
See all of today's Soccer News Links at: http://www.sams-army.com/
NAS is hosted by America Kicks (http://www.americakicks.com)
To subscribe or unsubscribe: http://nas.americakicks.com
To post, send an email to nas@americakicks.com