Re: [nas] New United Striker?

I already deleted the original post - what is the source of the story that
references a Reyes exemption?

----- Original Message -----
From: <KLINDSTR@flash.net>


> IIRC, Reyes got hurt when?  A long damn time ago.
> United had MORE than enough time to find a
> replacement, and don't need some special treatment.
>
> This is crap.
>
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Matt Bernhardt <bernhardt.7@osu.edu>
>
> >Hey all,
> >
> >On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 11:35:13 -0500,
> <big_dog@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> >> Although the MLS signing period ended Aug. 20,
> United has been permitted
> >> by MLS to replace star defender Milton Reyes, who
> will not return to the
> >> active roster this year after suffering a serious
> knee injury in April.
> >
> >Wait a minute - is this correct? I thought the -only-
> exception that MLS
> >granted United was for a replacement for Bobby
> Convey. All other moves had
> >to take place before the 20th. And, I'm not sure but
> it would also seem
> >sporting for United to not have even that option,
> since it turns out
> >Convey's still on the roster.
> >
> >Or is there another exception being made here? Not
> that I mind the idea of
> >Martins playing in MLS - he's been phenomenal for
> Pittsburgh this year -
> >but my first impression is that the MLS "rules" are
> getting bent some more.
> >
> >Matt


---
See all of today's Soccer News Links at:  http://www.sams-army.com/
NAS is hosted by America Kicks (http://www.americakicks.com)
To subscribe or unsubscribe: http://nas.americakicks.com
To post, send an email to nas@americakicks.com