Re: [nas] Forbes: MLS team valuations

Interesting.  Thanks for posting this Kirsten.  I would not have thougth the Galaxy would be so far ahead of the rest.  That can't all be due to the Beckham effect, can it?
 

-russ
http://home.comcast.net/~rcampb61
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The best resource against the world's stupidity, meanness and despair
is simply telling the truth in all it's ambiguity and complexity.
--Mary Pipher, Ph.D.

----- Original Message ----
From: Kirsten Tautfest <no1gc@hotmail.com>
To: NAS <nas@americakicks.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 6:44:16 PM
Subject: [nas] Forbes: MLS team valuations

Based on 2007 data so San Jose is not included.

 

	Value	Revenue	Operating Income
LA Galaxy	100	36	4
Toronto FC	44	17	2.1
Chicago	41	16	-3.1
Dallas	39	15	0.5
RB NY	36	10	-4.5
DC	35	13	-3
Houston	33	10	-1.8
Colorado	31	11	-2.2
RSL	30	7	-2.1
NE Revs	27	10	-1.5
Chivas USA	24	10	-1
Columbus	23	6	-4.5
KC	22	5	-2.9

 

Numbers are in millions. I laid this out myself since you have to scroll through pictures to get all the numbers in order. Article link is here:

 

http://www.forbes.com/sportsbusiness/2008/09/09/mls-soccer-beckham-biz-sports-cz_kb_0909mlsvalues.html

 

http://tinyurl.com/5nyqbv

 

Now that Forbes is keeping up with our dear little league, it will be interesting to see how the numbers track from year to year as more stadiums come on line – or if the Crew can find some way to dig itself out of their hole.

 

Kirsten

 

 

 

 

Red Tales: In the Beginning available now!

 

---
See all of today's Soccer News Links at: http://www.sams-army.com/
NAS is hosted by America Kicks (http://www.americakicks.com)
To subscribe or unsubscribe: http://nas.americakicks.com
To post, send an email to nas@americakicks.com